Back to post list
Back a step
Replies:
Add reply:
Back a step
Elodin
Posts: 8,676 Status: King Karma: +1,179 [+1] [-1] |
Subject: I'd say | |||||
I see nothing wrong with subscription packages only being available using real $$ Why should those who actually spend real money on this game, and therefore effectively keep it running, subsidise those who spend nothing at all. Free game to play or not, those who spend nothing are actually leeching off those who do spend. So, so what if subscriptions are only available for real $$? It will either force those playing off welfare to actually spend, or it will take game gold out of circulation because the welfare cases will need to use it to get their subscriptions. |
||||||
No Signature |
||||||
|
Replies:
Add reply: